�@�X�^�[�����̃`�[���́AEngine�̃J�X�^�}�[�T�|�[�g�p�G�[�W�F���g�ł����uEva�v���킸��12���Ԃō\�z�����B�����́u�����قǍ����S�ƋZ�p�I�ȗ������������ɂ����ƁA�`�[���Ɠ����悤�ɁA�N�����Z�p�����}���A�O�����Ɏ~�߂Ă������͂����Ǝv���������v�ƌ����B�������A�����͂����ł͂Ȃ��B
These exist in confusables.txt because they map to the same abstract character under NFKC decomposition. The map is semantically correct. But from a visual perspective, these are false positives: a human would never confuse Mathematical Fraktur l with plain l.
，详情可参考夫子
Александра Синицына (Ночной линейный редактор)
中小商户的转型工具箱：从“卖床位”到“卖体验”
The experiment methodology left me dubious about the kind of point they wanted to make. Why not provide the agent with the ISA documentation? Why Rust? Writing a C compiler is exactly a giant graph manipulation exercise: the kind of program that is harder to write in Rust. Also, in a clean room experiment, the agent should have access to all the information about well established computer science progresses related to optimizing compilers: there are a number of papers that could be easily synthesized in a number of markdown files. SSA, register allocation, instructions selection and scheduling. Those things needed to be researched *first*, as a prerequisite, and the implementation would still be “clean room”.